Litigation financing enables individuals and businesses to pursue legal action despite financial constraints. This provides them with the funds needed to challenge bigger opponents.
Investors back these cases in return for a portion of future judgments or settlements. This method promotes fairness and accountability while addressing barriers to legal representation.
While gaining popularity, understanding the benefits and drawbacks of litigation financing ensures its continued value.
Litigation financing is also known as legal funding or lawsuit loans. It’s a mechanism that allows plaintiffs to secure the necessary funds to pursue a legal case.
Litigation funding involves a third-party funder, a specialized company. They provide financial help to cover the associated litigation costs.
In return, the funder receives a part of the settlement or judgment if the case is successful.
For plaintiffs who may not have the means to defend themselves, legal financing is ideal.
When a provider applies for this type of funding, they test the case’s strength and chances of success. If approved, the funder pays for expenditures, including court costs and attorney fees.
As such, the plaintiff continues the lawsuit without making any early financial obligations. The lawsuit funder gets their money back plus an agreed-upon profit when a winning decision is made.
Here are some aspects of this funding:
Despite its increasing popularity, litigation financing is often misunderstood.
Here are some common misconceptions:
In reality, both plaintiffs and defendants can seek litigation financing. Defendants may use it to manage the costs of their defense.
Concerns exist that it could incentivize lawsuits by offering financial backing to claimants with weak cases. Besides, reputable providers conduct thorough assessments of claims to mitigate this risk.
Litigation financing is not a traditional loan.
Unlike a loan, the funding is non-recourse, meaning the litigant only repays if the case is successful. If the case is unsuccessful, the litigant typically owes nothing to the litigation funder.
Some believe that commercial litigation financing increases legal costs. But, proponents argue that it can help level the playing field. This allows individuals to pursue a legal claim against more powerful opponents.
There is a misconception that all litigation finance providers operate similarly. In reality, different companies may have varying terms, conditions, and ethical standards. Litigants must check and choose reputable and transparent funders.
Working with a reputable and trustworthy company is crucial. To find litigation funding firms, plaintiffs should conduct thorough research.
Here are some tips to take:
Before finalizing any agreement, consult with your legal counsel. Ensure that your attorney is comfortable with the terms and conditions of the funding arrangement.
Litigation financing is a resource for businesses seeking justice but lacking the finances. But, plaintiffs must test the potential benefits and risks.
With careful consideration, third-party litigation funding can let plaintiffs fight for their rights.